Seedrs or Crowdcube – who to chose when crowdfunding?

Having now raised two rounds of investment with the help of Seedrs.com, I often get asked for advice about which company I would chose (if I could do it all again).

Having not worked with Crowdcube, the question for me really becomes, would I recommend Seedrs and why?

Over the years I have always passionately defended Seedrs and my reasoning was on several different levels.

1. Values – I have heard and read some negative things about Crowdcube from an ethics point of view, relating to how little support small campaigns get and how they over-state the amount of money they helped raised to include funds raised by the companies without their help. Seedrs, from my experience, has values that are more aligned to ours at Rare Pink in terms of their integrity, authenticity and passion for helping each other succeed.

2. Due Diligence  – Comparing campaigns I have seen on Crowdcube and Seedrs, I think Seedrs are more diligent in terms of who they let on to the platform, making it harder for you to launch your campaign… and that’s a good thing. You want to have the best chance of convincing investors and if someone can tell you what needs improving before you’re investor ready, then I see that as value being added.

3. The Underdog – On a personal level, I wanted to work with Seedrs to help them to do well too. I think Seedrs has for some time been slightly smaller than Crowdcube (though not anymore it seems – now ranked number one in various categories of investment).

They both have similarly large number of investors. I believe you will have the same access to funding by working with either of them but I feel Seedrs try harder by having had to play catch up in the past.

What about the money?!

To be completely honest, I do feel that the most important thing everyone cares about is: “will the one platform help me to raise more, faster (or at all)?”

I can’t answer this accurately. Crowdcube has had more high profile successes from what I have seen but I also feel like more campaigns are live at any point in time compared to Seedrs, thus diluting investor interest.

The secret no one tells you when you start…

So let me close this post off with a little secret. We got more value out of Seedrs in what they do after you raise than we got during.

This is not to say they did not do everything they could to help us raise… what I am saying is that there is enormous value in the admin and legal work they do that would otherwise have involved me spending hours trying to learn my way around what is a confusing landscape.

For two years we raised without the aid of paid legal counsel. I DO NOT SUGGEST THIS – we learned on our second round that it is important to get legal advice once your funding round starts to get more complicated (think VCs, accelerators, options, parent-child company structures etc.); and we now have legal counsel.

The benefit of having Seedrs as an ally was huge and as a first time fund-raising entrepreneur you can not know how complicated things can get and how much work there is around the closing of a round.

So yes, I would pick Seedrs over Crowdcube and give them a solid 10/10 in terms of how likely I am to recommend them.

The Ant

I thought about the ant the other day. It is so very small. So small and yet it does a lot of what people do. It goes places, eats, builds and lives in a community where it plays its part to the survival of the entire group.

But the ant has such a small brain. I wonder if you can even see it with the naked eye.

So that just made me wonder: Our brains are SO BIG in comparison and yet how much more do we do than live just like the ants do?

I think we could be spending more time learning more, using our imagination and creativity to create, to innovate, to change the world. We only need 1 millionth of our brain to live like ants do… lets push ourselves to do more, be more, create more with the other 99.999%.

A New Way Of Doing Business – true sustainability

Today I recalled one of my first Business Studies lectures in high school. The lesson was simple:

People (we) have unlimited wants and needs but there are only so many scarce resources that are available to satisfy them.

The lesson was important because it taught me about competition. Because people have a limited budget they will CHOOSE how to spend their money and you, as a business have to compete for their wallets.


But today I realised there was another lesson in that sentence which has taken 10 years to surface:

As long as people have unlimited wants and needs and resources remain scarce, inequality will persist. In fact, I am pretty certain that the more we are able to satisfy our desires, the more inequality we create by doing so.

Let me explain why I think this is the case:


When you are poor you want and need only basic things. You may dream of being wealthy but your limited budget only permits you to have so much and this is usually limited to food, shelter and safety. As you earn more you begin to want more and this comes in the form of education, comfort and at some point even happiness becomes important. It is happiness that is the most expensive good of all because it evolves and grows into an all consuming resource monster by the time you are among the wealthy few (think of the cars, yachts and properties the top 1% own). Along the way, people have been known to steal, bribe, murder, deceive and  manipulate their way to riches. This is true not only of individuals but also for countries and large organisations which fight wars or compete by playing dirty on a massive scale.


All this has happened because “happiness” goods which have now become so much more important (as our basic needs have been catered for), cost a lot of resources. There are now 7 billion people and while the number of those in poverty is very large, so too is the number of people looking for happiness. 

For as long as happiness is primarily fulfilled through products and services that require physical resources to be made, inequality will increase. 

Now think of 10 products or services you really, REALLY want. Write them down. Put a price to them. Think about what was needed to make them. Can you image a world where everyone, all seven billion of us, had those 10 things too? Where would we find all the resources to make them all? Will we have enough resources left for our children? Now imagine if all the things you really wanted could be made out of thin air. They required no resources and everyone could have them. WOW! That would mean that happiness is within reach of anyone who wants it.


You may think this is an impossible dream. But I believe there is only one barrier to achieving this kind of world and that is the problem of imagination. People only want products they know about. How many people wanted an iPad or a car before it existed. None! The only people who can make this dream a reality are entrepreneurs, because WE CREATE PRODUCTS and SERVICES. We imagine them, we build them, we perfect them and we sell them.

Imagine a business that creates products or services that do not consume any resources but for the capital, time and people needed to create them (and even then very little). This business can sell happiness goods to those who have already escaped poverty and are now searching for happiness and self-realization. The money they make can then be spent on helping those who remain in poverty to escape it. Is this possible? I don’t know, but through the internet I believe we finally have a medium where resource-less products are not only possible but also very scalable. E-commerce used to be about taking goods out of the store and putting them on to the internet. Can we now think about creating a new range of products, services or experiences that help people want less of what is physically made and more of what makes them truly happy?

As for an example, think of online dating sites – a good example of a resource-free happiness service. What’s missing is for those profits to not help create one or two fat cats, but rather, to invest them into those countries that are poverty stricken. Perhaps it is when thinking about this last part where even a dreamer like me wonders if this truly is possible?!